Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 00:01
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 169
2-Core 338
105% 197 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 936
98% 786 Pts
64-Core 1171
72% 1171 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.02
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.8% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 60.7
Parallax 79.1
45% 65.1 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 44.5
44% 55 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVME SSD 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0225A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 581 380 74 76 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 2,081
Write 593
Mixed 774
SusWrite 293
204% 935 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 34.3
239% 99.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 336
296% 434 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 192%
Great: 173%
ESA3SMH2HTH2BT240GB 240GB
91GB free
Firmware: S1205A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 414 417 99 64 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 492
Write 408
Mixed 372
SusWrite 244
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 31
138% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 46.4
68% 126 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 84%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
878GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 113 112 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 132
Write 107
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 113
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$71
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 30.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 31.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $617
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback