Gigabyte GA-B250-FinTech-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B250-FinTech
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250-FinTech-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180104
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 22:47
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$155
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 205
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 504
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 91.9
0% 52.5 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 48.4
50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
661GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 76 69 109 109 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 79
SusWrite 93.3
71% 96 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
440GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 124 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 175
Write 155
Mixed 107
SusWrite 126
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
230GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 90 86 87 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 61.6
Write 91.9
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 87.7
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 66%
Intenso External USB 3.0 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 578e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 31 36 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 13.2
Write 13.4
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 34.8
28% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.M8FR Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.3% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250-FinTech-CF Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250-FinTech-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback