PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro H8DG6/H8DGi (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro H8DG6/H8DGi |
Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101210 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 07 '22 at 17:02 |
Run Duration | 199 Seconds |
Run User | SVK-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6134
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
40.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B E208) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 175 166 186 189 183 MB/s
|
42.7%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9965447-042.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: AMD Opteron 63801stBench 50%, 73 samples | 6x |
CPU: AMD Opteron 6386 SE1stBench 54%, 93 samples | 5x |
CPU: AMD Opteron 63481stBench 51%, 21 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 5x |
R9 FuryAMD $199Bench 58%, 18,014 samples | 4x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $155 |