Today's hottest deals

Asus P7H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P7H55  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 21:46
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 198
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 490
53% 420 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$155
CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 33.8
21% 23.6 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 23.4
21% 26.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 147 70 20 54 14 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Average
Read 245
Write 221
Mixed 218
SusWrite 82.5
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 22.3
109% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32
DQ Write 95.6
DQ Mixed 0.3
18% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55 Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback