Asus G75VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G75VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G75VW
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 02:32
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 441
50% 389 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Asus(1043 2115) 2GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
7.33% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 11.1
6% 10 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 9.7
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.33%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 401 388 393 391 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 446
Write 388
Mixed 352
SusWrite 397
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 22.3
92% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 43.9
86% 165 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 102%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
910GB free
Firmware: JA0OA480
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 90 85 85 84 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 61.4
Write 0.2
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 83.5
31% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F HMT351S6EFR8A-PB Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback