Lenovo 5032A9M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 5032A9M  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 08:45
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 144
58% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 208
32% 231 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 18
13% 16.9 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 15.6
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 8.1 70 7.9 12 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 385
Write 285
Mixed 286
SusWrite 45.5
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 18.2
86% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 81.2
DQ Write 8.6
DQ Mixed 0.2
12% 30 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
551GB free
Firmware: CC57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 177 167 180 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 173
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 176
110% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB RMR5030MN68F9F1600 HMT351U6EFR8C-PB RMR5030MN68F9F1600 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 5032A9M Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 5032A9M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback