Today's hottest deals

Asus K52JK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus K52JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52JK
Memory1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 16:54
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 102
45% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 139
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
Asus(1043 1C42) 1GB
Driver: atiu9p64 aticfx64 atiu9pag aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Ver. 8.692.1.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 1.8
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 106 106 104 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 85.3
Write 94
Mixed 31
SusWrite 104
57% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
4GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 6 7.2 6 8.3 7.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 28.6
Write 17
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 6.3
14% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
41% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD73I1B1672EG 06C1 SSY3128M8-EDJED 3GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
23.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52JK Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback