Avell C62 MOB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAvell C62 MOB  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell Avell C62 MOB
Memory2.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 21:04
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 133
59% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 367
44% 339 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 58%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1140) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 3.9
4% 16.2 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 4.2
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IM2P33F8A-512GD 512GB
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103B0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 879 529 802 508 390 314 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,531
Write 1,102
Mixed 906
SusWrite 570
229% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 24.7
126% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 465
352% 477 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 155%
Great: 246%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4S320038G22-BHYD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 8.5
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C62 MOB Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Avell C62 MOB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback