Lenovo 10CTS05300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10CTS05300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 13:42
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10 PRO-7800B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 119
43% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 178
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 30B2) 128MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 12.6
7% 9.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2111XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 283 122 173 89 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 287
Write 48.5
Mixed 246
SusWrite 186
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 1.2
43% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 58.3
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 94.5
84% 122 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8.8
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback