Today's hottest deals

Samsung 750BBC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung 750BBC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT750BBC-K09G
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 09:57
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 251
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 558
58% 469 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Sanyo(144D C826) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 8.2
6% 8.1 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT22K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 109 106 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 397
Write 334
Mixed 347
SusWrite 110
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 43.2
133% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 145
142% 231 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
914GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 135 138 136 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 114
Write 116
Mixed 68
SusWrite 131
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
imation Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.9% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 21.6
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750BBC Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 750BBC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback