Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG Z690 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D32
MotherboardMSI MAG Z690 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 11:05
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$169
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 192
2-Core 383
118% 223 Pts
4-Core 753
8-Core 1,251
122% 1,002 Pts
64-Core 1,819
113% 1,819 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$709
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4999 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 283
Reflection 258
Parallax 293
230% 278 fps
MRender 329
Gravity 236
Splatting 175
194% 247 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 195%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,467
Write 1,578
Mixed 1,593
415% 1,879 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 242
4K Mixed 102
360% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,874
DQ Write 1,500
DQ Mixed 1644
1,242% 1,673 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
IR-SSDPR-S25A-120 120GB
16GB free
Firmware: SBFM01.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 433
Write 414
Mixed 340
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 32.2
137% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 201
185% 283 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 103%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
63GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 129 128 106 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 99.3
Write 99.1
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 118
61% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
16GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 40.1
Write 37.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 38
26% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 36%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
17GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 33.7
Write 34.4
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 39.3
25% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21%
Great: 35%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
130GB free
Firmware: JA2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 44 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 88.9
Write 43.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 44.8
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 57%
WDC WD10 JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
75GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 98 90 103 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 98.2
Write 97.8
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 96.6
115% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-8GTRSC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 48.4
MC Write 45.9
MC Mixed 42.3
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 34.3
102% 35.8 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG Z690 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D32) Builds (Compare 10,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z690 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4 - $280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback