Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 01:05
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 593
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 103%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 212 174 164 154 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 489
Write 268
Mixed 256
SusWrite 178
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 36
145% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 234
201% 297 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 129%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
234GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 417 417 419 418 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 476
Mixed 338
SusWrite 419
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 48.2
166% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 282
231% 329 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 113%
Great: 118%
WD My Passport 0810 1TB
601GB free, PID 0810
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 105
Write 106
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 104
125% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 28.8
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 27.1
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 16,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $292

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $960
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback