Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision T1700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T1700
MotherboardDell Precision T1700  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime35.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 10:30
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 381
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 19.9
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 15.9
16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 228
Write 214
Mixed 172
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 14.7
51% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 197
171% 257 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
891GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 88 164 164 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 172
Write 144
Mixed 88
SusWrite 126
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 109%
Generic MassStorageClass 8GB
7GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 17.3
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 17.5
25% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
56% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 21%
ST325082 0A 250GB
19GB free, PID 007e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 21.6
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 21.5
30% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1700 Builds (Compare 2,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback