HP Laptop 15s-gr0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-gr0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D2
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210818
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 06:09
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 39.4
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 112
41% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 134
21% 151 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 87D2) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.24
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR045 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 298 302 295 313 308 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 326
Write 306
Mixed 298
SusWrite 301
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 41.4
123% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 417
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 414
300% 390 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 228%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
889GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 112 112 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 140
Write 101
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 112
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
176% 2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE V01D4S88GB1G81G83200 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.7% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 13.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11.1
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-gr0xxx Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-gr0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback