Today's hottest deals

Sicomputer MS-7A15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSicomputer MS-7A15  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 09:56
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 190
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 368
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
MSI(1462 7A15) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.43 fps
Gravity 8
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 243 251 238 251 251 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 412
Mixed 419
SusWrite 244
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 55.6
189% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 267
224% 325 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 128%
ASolid USB 32GB
17GB free, PID 205a
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 20 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 114
Write 36.6
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 20.9
50% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
99% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.7
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7A15 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Sicomputer MS-7A15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback