Asus P5QPL-AM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5QPL-AM  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100510
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 19:23
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 45.8
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 79.6
33% 55.2 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 148
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Asus(1043 836D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.32% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.32%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SPCCSolidStateDisk 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 95 107 109 87 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 173
Write 145
Mixed 147
SusWrite 104
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 15.3
58% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 31.3
DQ Mixed 32.5
24% 30 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
417GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 74 97 84 94 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 97.5
Mixed 68
SusWrite 87.8
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 3.9
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QPL-AM Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QPL-AM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback