Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 10:27
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 140
57% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 226
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 108F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 6.4
5% 8.77 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.8
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T871202
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 301
Write 345
Mixed 267
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 28.4
106% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 281
189% 226 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 90%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
499GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 111 112 109 112 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 103
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 109
60% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
154% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04CB AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback