Acer Predator PH315-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive423% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL QX60_TLS
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211207
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '22 at 15:20
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 218
66% 125 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 537
54% 437 Pts
64-Core 738
46% 738 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 154
Parallax 11.7
8% 58.4 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.8
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3762 3657 3792 3301 1289 1238 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
423% Outstanding
Read 3,558
Write 3,472
Mixed 2,476
SusWrite 2,840
694% 3,086 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 77.9
250% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 661
DQ Mixed 905
612% 740 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 423%
Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE Kingston 9905744-035.A00G 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 25.2
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 12.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-54 Builds (Compare 3,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback