Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 18:44
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 107
2-Core 215
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 416
52% 396 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.2.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 22
13% 17.7 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 17
Splatting 14.1
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 73 55 73 29 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 433
Write 364
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 67.2
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 7.5
59% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 91.6
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 20.2
23% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$52
384GB free
Firmware: D005SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 90 92 91 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 89.2
Write 86.8
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 91.3
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 58%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
2GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 4.5 4.5 4.3 4.1 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 3.9
9% 9.18 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL15-15-15 D4-2133 Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 24.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 17.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback