Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 645 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 645 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1992
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150310
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 19:03
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-4400M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Memory 32
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 28.6
20% 29.5 Pts
4-Core 27.4
8-Core 55.2
5% 41.3 Pts
64-Core 55.4
3% 55.4 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7520G
HP(103C 1992) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1005
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 2.9
2% 3.27 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.1
2% 3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 94 88 91 108 98 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.1% Poor
Read 138
Write 107
Mixed 116
SusWrite 93.4
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 5.9
20% 7.37 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 87.5
DQ Mixed 101
76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 82%
Toshiba MK5061GSY 500GB-$57
264GB free
Firmware: MC102E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 51 45 47 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 41.4
Write 54.5
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 48.6
31% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 243
16% 243 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 645 G1 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 645 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback