Today's hottest deals

Medion MD35004

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD35004  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 21:07
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 242
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 766
74% 608 Pts
64-Core 891
55% 891 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Zotac(19DA 9548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 54
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 53.6
44% 54.7 fps
MRender 43.1
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 45.8
38% 45.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 412 432 438 451 460 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 427
Mixed 361
SusWrite 436
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 37.7
135% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 205
176% 255 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.6% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD35004 Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Medion MD35004

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback