Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FA
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 22:47
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 152
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 205
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80FA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 5
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 125 167 78 170 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 420
Write 291
Mixed 215
SusWrite 134
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 18.6
64% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 43.6
DQ Mixed 101
95% 156 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G1A1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.6
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Builds (Compare 623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback