Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 17:24
Run Duration357 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 793
79% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,255
78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 99.1
58% 79.5 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 53
53% 66 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
832GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1145 1287 1272 1328 1320 1288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,421
Write 1,353
Mixed 975
SusWrite 1,273
282% 1,256 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 50.7
174% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 405
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 219
187% 280 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 202%
Great: 255%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
413GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 440 437 448 450 451 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 457
Mixed 373
SusWrite 444
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 42.2
140% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 214
166% 226 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
328GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 93 57 291 877 234 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,316
Write 909
Mixed 816
SusWrite 408
192% 862 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 49.6
174% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 190
152% 210 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 141%
Great: 209%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 201 202 197 202 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 138
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 198
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
588GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 180 174 178 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 124
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 179
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.3
404% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 163 163 162 163 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 100
Write 141
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 162
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
416% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 39
Write 38.5
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 4.5
38% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 38.6
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 0.1
36% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 58%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 36.3
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 34.9
47% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.1
Write 38.7
Mixed 35.1
48% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 58%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 90 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42% Average
Read 106
Write 112
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 88.6
130% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 34
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 36.1
45% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 24.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $874
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback