Today's hottest deals

Asus P4P800-X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P4P800-X  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060329
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 18:17
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 35.5
30% 40.5 Pts
4-Core 35.3
8-Core 35.5
5% 35.4 Pts
64-Core 33.8
2% 33.8 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
AMD(1002 0028) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.753.0.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 3.8
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 7.3
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 74 59 55 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32% Below average
Read 125
Write 95.8
Mixed 98
SusWrite 68.4
22% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 17.5
70% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 41.2
DQ Mixed 26.3
21% 29 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 32%
Great: 87%
Maxtor 6L160P0 164GB-$55
8GB free
Firmware: BAJ41G20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 27 28 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 8.8
Write 23.4
Mixed 15.6
SusWrite 26.9
14% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.4
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 36%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
157GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 78 75 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 78.2
Write 75.2
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 78
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 512, 1024, 512 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P4P800-X Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P4P800-X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback