Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B75-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LX  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120820
Uptime9 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 17:46
Run Duration394 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 182
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 342
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
PNY(196E 0F00) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 2
4% 4.03 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
779GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 53 34 33 57 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 374
Write 284
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 41.6
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 8.1
34% 8.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 58%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
808GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 28 30 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 25.5
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 29.6
20% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
34.6% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback