Fujitsu LIFEBOOK LH531

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK LH531  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB17
Memory10.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 08:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 80
2-Core 149
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 192
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15EA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 71 81 77 88 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 88.8
Write 81.1
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 79.1
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 61%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
10GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 12 12 12 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 11.4
13% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK LH531 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK LH531

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback