Gigabyte GA-MQLP7AP-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemGIGABYTE GB-BXi7-5500
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MQLP7AP-00  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20151208
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 15:33
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 78%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 42.9
40% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 147
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.9
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0422C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 90 67 74 66 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 313
Write 204
Mixed 155
SusWrite 98.6
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 22.4
63% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 185
136% 177 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 5
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MQLP7AP-00 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MQLP7AP-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback