Today's hottest deals

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory1.7 GB free of 3.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100406
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 02:05
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3505
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 122
54% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 127
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N mSATA 128GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM45D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 26 28 27 59 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.8% Average
Read 192
Write 232
Mixed 181
SusWrite 58.3
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 23.5
75% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 126
102% 147 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 94%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.9 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
176% Outstanding
Read 607
Write 12.3
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 5.2
116% 161 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
595% 4.33 MB/s
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
690GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.8 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Read 24.9
Write 26.9
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 5.9
13% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 89%
JMicron Generic DISK00 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.3 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 24.5
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 1.5
26% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK01 2TB
465GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.8 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 26.6
Write 23.4
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 5
26% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 71%
JMicron Generic DISK02 2TB
431GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 23.4
Write 24.1
Mixed 22
SusWrite 1.2
23% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK03 2TB
590GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 24.1
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 1.2
22% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
124% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK04 2TB
912GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 0.9 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 24.5
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 1
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B2873EH1-CH9 37GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
40% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback