Today's hottest deals

Razer Book 13 - RZ09-0357

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Book 13 - RZ09-0357  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer MA310
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201120
Uptime13.6 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 00:06
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 131
2-Core 244
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 509
58% 451 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1A58 1008) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 29.9
19% 26.4 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 34
Splatting 1
14% 19.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 319 308 297 298 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,597
Write 394
Mixed 891
SusWrite 349
177% 808 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 38.3
139% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 765
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 564
407% 539 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 151%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D4NQ 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 52.1
MC Mixed 39.8
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 16.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Book 13 - RZ09-0357 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Razer Book 13 - RZ09-0357

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback