Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 03:52
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 71
2-Core 120
55% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 201
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 52%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 81
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 112
66% 87.3 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 84.3
Splatting 42.3
50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 62%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 99 100 101 94 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.1% Above average
Read 241
Write 189
Mixed 212
SusWrite 106
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 30.8
97% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 186
141% 190 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
303GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 147 140 141 131 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 106
Write 98.9
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 134
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback