MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 07:03
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 587
70% 538 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 115
Parallax 124
106% 123 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.7
92% 117 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 305 181 180 185 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 432
Mixed 346
SusWrite 233
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 56.8
188% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 108%
Great: 131%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
102GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 364 214 11 11 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 484
Write 411
Mixed 396
SusWrite 163
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 28.3
DQ Mixed 0.5
22% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
120GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 104 104 106 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 86.1
Write 54.6
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 103
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 114%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
37GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 54.4
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 61.4
37% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 65%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
91GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 72 73 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 70.7
Write 66.6
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 71.6
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
97% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 43%
ASMT 2115 640GB
5GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 19 22 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 43.3
Write 23.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 21.3
34% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 39%
WDC WD10 EADS-65L5B1 1TB
399GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 42 42 42 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 37.9
Write 36.5
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 40.5
49% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$118
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback