Intel NUC7JYB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIntel(R) NUC7CJYH
MotherboardIntel NUC7JYB  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 08:32
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 46.1
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 112
41% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 117
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2072) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.4
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 267 324 317 309 313 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 336
Write 273
Mixed 277
SusWrite 302
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 12.1
87% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 39.3
60% 112 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SK_Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF Crucial CT8G4SFD8213.C16FD 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7JYB Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7JYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback