Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 22:22
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$325
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 112
2-Core 251
79% 146 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 835
79% 656 Pts
64-Core 2,006
124% 2,006 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.4% Good
Lighting 79.6
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 75
65% 76.6 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 58.5
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zhitai PC005 Active 512GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZT00D212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 651 377 415 400 287 343 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 2,384
Write 1,636
Mixed 1,466
SusWrite 412
327% 1,475 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 55
179% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 542
408% 556 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 201%
Great: 300%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
249GB free
Firmware: AX005L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 68.4
Write 72.3
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 62.7
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
59GB free
Firmware: AX005L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 94 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 88.1
Write 88.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 94.1
55% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
170GB free
Firmware: AM003F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 105 105 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 113
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 103
62% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU881-26N1900 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 31.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 30.4
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 5,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $492
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback