TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP h8-1437c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h8-1437c  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 04:32
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 115
51% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 179
22% 170 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 48.6%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Device(1B0A 90BE) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 1.88%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 385 391 396 342 352 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 372
Write 360
Mixed 338
SusWrite 371
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 29.1
88% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 357
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 81.5%
 Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 178 178 175 181 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 126
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 177
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 95.5%
 Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 25.8%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical h8-1437c Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1437c

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples26x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples3x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples1x
GPU
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples12x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples4x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples3x
WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TBWDCBench 54%, 17,953 samples3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples2x
RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 12GBHynixBench 42%, 122 samples8x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 12GBMicronBench 43%, 73 samples3x
RMR5040MM58F9F1600 Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 12GBRamaxelBench 37%, 29 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback