Biostar A58MDP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardBiostar A58MDP  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 11:17
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 104
56% 87 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 106
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
MSI(1462 8094) 2GB
CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 6.8
4% 5.33 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G32TNF-N3A0A 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 146 138 133 138 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.8% Good
Read 244
Write 232
Mixed 222
SusWrite 135
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 39.3
135% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 121
100% 144 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
233GB free
Firmware: SS16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 93 92 94 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 86.1
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 93.6
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
293GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 102 101 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 101
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown G Skill Intl F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58MDP Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A58MDP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback