HP p6-2350eo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP p6-2350eo  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 16:04
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 463
53% 412 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-OEM
Sapphire(174B 5207) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 20.8
14% 23.4 fps
MRender 31.7
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 21.6
18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L2 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 95 102 99 101 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.7% Average
Read 249
Write 122
Mixed 130
SusWrite 98.2
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 19.2
77% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 56.2
71% 128 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 81%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
659GB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 188 190 195 194 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 195
Mixed 84
SusWrite 192
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 112%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2350eo Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2350eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback