Today's hottest deals

Zotac MCP61P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemnVidia MCP61
MotherboardZotac MCP61P  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '20 at 21:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 90.2
44% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 153
17% 134 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-OEM
Nvidia(10DE 0873) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 28
Parallax 20.5
14% 22.1 fps
MRender 32.5
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 23.8
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST332082 0SCE 320GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 42 45 46 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 44.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 40.5
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
20GB free
Firmware: HP22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 112 111 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 98
Write 46
Mixed 52
SusWrite 112
56% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 70%
WD WD1600AAJB-00PVA0 160GB
12GB free
Firmware: 58.01H58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 29.2
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 29.4
20% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.4% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MCP61P Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Zotac MCP61P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback