Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A78LT-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A78LT-M  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 06:04
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 90.9
46% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 180
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Asus(1043 0294) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 9
Parallax 3.7
5% 6.13 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 138 117 133 130 127 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 204
Write 183
Mixed 162
SusWrite 136
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 7.7
36% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 17.1
12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 55%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
134GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 33.6
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 68.1
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A78LT-M Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A78LT-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback