Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 19:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 500
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.83 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 6.5 187 62 121 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 342
Write 355
Mixed 299
SusWrite 74.8
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 22.1
94% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 88.8
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 75.3
89% 149 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
415GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 119 115 119 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 104
Write 117
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 118
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 7.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback