Today's hottest deals

HP HPE-350es

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP HPE-350es  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory11 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100519
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 11:55
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$290
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 145
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 352
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Nvidia(10DE 0753) 1.8GB
Ram: 1.8GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 11
Parallax 3.8
6% 7.6 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 3.3
5% 6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 227 223 223 224 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.8% Above average
Read 233
Write 220
Mixed 216
SusWrite 225
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 21.5
81% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 183
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 125%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
918GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 131 131 130 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 92.5
Write 44
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 132
63% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 75%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.8 4.8 4.8 5.3 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 4
Mixed 12
SusWrite 5.4
13% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.8
53% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-040.A00LF CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 CE80CE80 M378B5673FH0-CH9 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 12.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-350es Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP HPE-350es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $434
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $118
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback