Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '17 at 10:43
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User EUR-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 97
49% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 241
27% 214 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Asus(1043 8291) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
7.07% Terrible
Lighting 9.43
Reflection 8.27
Parallax 3.38
8% 7.03 fps
MRender 8.38
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 6.09
6% 7.32 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 339
Mixed 382
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 85
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 15.5
183% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 16.8
41% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 9905471-001.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 9.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback