Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Memory 39.8 1-Core 62.5 2-Core 117 41% 73 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 86.4 14% 97.6 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1DC2 2203) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.2 2% 1.97 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.5 2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biwin CNF82NS1F00-128 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0R SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 204 123 131 129 133 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.7% Average	Read 317 Write 307 Mixed 292 SusWrite 170 61% 271 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 9.3 56% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 86.6 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 27 54% 104 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
DDR4 123456789012345678 2x2GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 203 20% 203 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 19%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	36x
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	22x
Athlon Silver 3050e GraphicsAMDBench 39%, 252 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	58x
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 17,211 samples	1x

SSD
128GB SSD 128GBForeseeBench 59%, 2,750 samples	31x
256GB SSD 256GBForeseeBench 79%, 1,745 samples	8x
SD9SN8W128G1122 128GBSandiskBench 71%, 95 samples	5x