Lenovo 3212AV1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 3212AV1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181211
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 17:54
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 326
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 42
Parallax 39.1
30% 39.5 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 28.2
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 245
Write 205
Mixed 172
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 24.4
82% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 163
129% 180 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
3GB free
Firmware: MKAOAA50
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 70.9
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 87%
USB3.0 high speed 2TB
1GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 22
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 22.3
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 M378B5173QH0-CK0 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.8% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3212AV1 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3212AV1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback