Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	5.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121130
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '22 at 22:38
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 117 2-Core 235 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 463 59% 446 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1499 MHz, MLim: 1761 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.6% Below average	Lighting 42.3 Reflection 67.7 Parallax 42.6 34% 50.9 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 42.3 Splatting 37.2 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 35 23 24 31 28 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	5.5% Terrible	Read 67.9 Write 66.8 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 27.4 12% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.8 4% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 5.5% Great: 56%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 431GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 109 114 114 114 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 118 Write 120 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 113 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 417GB free Firmware: GG2OAC90 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 102 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 102 Write 99.4 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 102 62% 85 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 14GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.1% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 14.2 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	120x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	68x
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	61x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	25x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,349 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $554

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16