Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 31.2 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 124 41% 76.1 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 206 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 183 185 184 183 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 149 Mixed 82 SusWrite 182 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.6 1.7 2.4 2.8 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Read 12.9 Write 3.7 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 2.6 8% 7.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A 2x4GB 485 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 248 16% 248 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	80x
Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples	29x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	29x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	11x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28