Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 22:09
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$127
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 155
2-Core 312
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 923
95% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,153
71% 1,153 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9078
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 8.9
6% 28.8 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 10
Splatting 0.1
5% 7.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 500GB-$60
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 235 117 226 129 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 498
Write 12.2
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 190
40% 187 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 31.3
139% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 57.1
93% 178 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$183
3TB free
Firmware: SC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 47 45 44 45 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 111
Write 59.2
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 46.6
53% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 36.3
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 33.3
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback