Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4702MQ 21,618 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 32.7 2-Core 61.1 38% 54.6 Pts	4-Core 87.3 8-Core 154 15% 121 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 115 76 44 89 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 430 Write 406 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 118 53% 242 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.5 28% 7.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 144GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 71 72 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	37% Below average	Read 55.4 Write 59.8 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 73.3 39% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/8G 16GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	49.5% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 15.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	97x
Radeon HD 8600/8700MAMDBench 6%, 1,000 samples	1x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	6x
HP16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 638 samples	4x
HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 2,690 samples	3x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $39