Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X299 UD4 Pro
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display7680 x 4320 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 18:31
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$395
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 255
80% 150 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 927
84% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,713
106% 1,713 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 202
Parallax 221
159% 206 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 203
Splatting 166
167% 210 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 150%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 265 267 421 413 415 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 430
Write 393
Mixed 344
SusWrite 369
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 30.9
113% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 226
200% 300 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB
386GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 438 135 400 425 440 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 402
Mixed 364
SusWrite 381
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 31.3
116% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 229
203% 306 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
6TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 165 174 156 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 105
Write 134
Mixed 72
SusWrite 167
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
230% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
6TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 162 166 166 164 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 107
Write 116
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 163
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
225% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 160 159 160 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 154
Write 123
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 158
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 157 157 158 156 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 118
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 156
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 97%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
29GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.2 4.9 4.7 5.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Read 29.6
Write 6.7
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 5.6
15% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
41% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 20%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
14GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.1 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.89% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 10.2
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 8.4
15% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 15.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 9.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $1,500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback