Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 130% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X299 UD4 Pro
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF (all builds)
Memory	57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	7680 x 4320 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '22 at 18:31
Run Duration	289 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900X-$620 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 255 80% 150 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 927 84% 705 Pts	64-Core 1,713 106% 1,713 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8667) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.65 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	150% Outstanding	Lighting 196 Reflection 202 Parallax 221 159% 206 fps	MRender 261 Gravity 203 Splatting 166 167% 210 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB 3,599 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: STAS1024 SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 265 267 421 413 415 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 430 Write 393 Mixed 344 SusWrite 369 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 30.9 113% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 226 200% 300 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 114%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB 3,599 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 386GB free Firmware: STAS1024 SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 438 135 400 425 440 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 434 Write 402 Mixed 364 SusWrite 381 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 31.3 116% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 229 203% 306 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$110 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 6TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 165 174 156 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 105 Write 134 Mixed 72 SusWrite 167 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.7 230% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$110 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 6TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 162 166 166 164 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 107 Write 116 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 163 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.7 225% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 160 159 160 160 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 154 Write 123 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 158 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 157 157 158 156 158 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 118 Mixed 86.1 SusWrite 156 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 97%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 29GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.2 4.9 4.7 5.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	6.62% Terrible	Read 29.6 Write 6.7 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 5.6 15% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 41% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.62% Great: 20%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.1 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	6.89% Terrible	Read 25.1 Write 10.2 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 8.4 15% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 26% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.89% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 15.6 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 9.6 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF Builds (Compare 658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 174%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 189%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF

CPU
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	162x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	88x
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	47x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	70x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	50x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	38x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	45x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	24x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	20x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	138x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	89x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,382

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16