Today's hottest deals

HP 500-002ec

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-002ec  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 01:13
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 62
1-Core 57.2
2-Core 121
47% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 179
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
MSI(1462 2821) 2GB
CLim: 1304 MHz, MLim: 1827 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 29% Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP210715
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 169 141 245 163 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 439
Write 51.5
Mixed 357
SusWrite 175
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 10.4
81% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 43
DQ Mixed 6.8
29% 67.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 93%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
15GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 393
Mixed 379
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 19.7
109% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 27.5
72% 152 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-002ec Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-002ec

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback