Asus WS E500 G5_WS690T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus WS E500 G5_WS690T  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS C246 PRO
Memory47.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201113
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 13:36
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 154
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 614
54% 462 Pts
64-Core 1,186
73% 1,186 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
PNY(196E 134E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 207
Parallax 238
172% 219 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 214
Splatting 170
172% 217 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 158%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,302
Write 1,012
Mixed 1,006
246% 1,107 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 53
176% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 666
502% 678 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
871GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 76.4
Mixed 72.4
68% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESC.M16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 23.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS E500 G5_WS690T Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus WS E500 G5_WS690T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback